Interesting. Are you making that up? Are you revising history? Are you making a

Interesting. Are you making that up? Are you revising history? Are you making a statement about the natural consequences of any political-economic order as if they are particular to just those two? Have you learned so much about the enemy’s methods of mythicism that you have adopted them as your own despite our efforts to purge them? Because we have libraries of documentation about the history of oth strategies as maximization of good for additional classes of peoples.
I have clearly failed to teach you the meaning of decidability as independent of subjective, and group subjective interest or preference. I’ve certainly failed to teach you the difference between the science of decidability and the application of that science – while you consistently and increasingly use semitic mythicism to justify your ambitions rather than simply accept the science and the application of to suit your preferences.
I realize that this is my fault because I haven’t continued working with you deeply and consistently enough given that the work I’ve done with brad has consumed my time and effort and I cannot seem to make the two of you productive at the same time, nor can I toggle between two frames of reference at the same time and work with you on different topics.
But regardless of fault, the consequences are as they are. In that you have motives that are rational for yourself and your polity and perhaps polities in proximity. And you cannot apparently frame your preferences and utilities as such and instead wish them universals (science) not a particular (philosophy). And I cannot seem to get you to adopt that frame when working with me or the group instead of attempting to counter or undermine our efforts at producing decidability under which yes. you may justify your ambitions as applications of that science of decidability.
This is just a practical reality. That despite my love and admiration for you. Despite your extraordinary and rare ability. Despite your contributions, is becoming not an illustration of the applicability of the science as I have encouraged, but a demand to abandon science in favor of a philosophy.
I try to let people grow on their own learn on their own and to own their conclusions on their own. But I try to given them (you) both counter-position and encouragement at the same time to prevent them from going sideways. And I am clearly failing in this case which is far more than disappointing because you have no peers of equal ability and my chances of finding others in what is left of my life are waning.

Hugs
CD

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS