You are a good person to follow (for me, as a researcher) because you are half r

You are a good person to follow (for me, as a researcher) because you are half right often, and half wrong the rest, and passionate and articulate either way. This means you provide sufficient clarity that assists in providing insight into common means by which the feminine mind ‘goes wrong’.
However, there is nothing serious in your response. It is feminine projection, shaming, and moralizing as if people of achievement operate on as simple intuitions that you do. They don’t. They have a public face where they talk down to the common folk. They have a professional face they share with peers. And they have practical skills that have allowed the to achieve what and where they have.
These people are hired because (a) they are aware of those interests and how those interests abuse the government (b) they have an axe to grind because of it, (c) they have street credibility with the activists in the public (d) they can hold their own on social media, in front of the media – which is what the conservatives understood and the democrats and in particular the DNC and their puppets in the media did not.
This last point is perhaps the most important. The left as a feminine institution applying (as you did above) the feminine means of undermining, evades argument and instead tries to destroy the character and reputation of anyone who gains credibility. The Trump coalition is building a team that can argue from multiple directions in a time when the feminine means of undermining has run it’s course with the public.
Reality by chanting is over.

Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice