You’re a nitwit. ;). ps: I was in ukraine at the staart of russian aggression, a

You’re a nitwit. ;). ps: I was in ukraine at the staart of russian aggression, and spent time with both praavy sektor and azov.

Statement:
–“Russia has destroyed one nato trained army in Ukraine and has almost destroyed the second. “Little ukraine” had one of the largest armies in the world, equipped and trained by nato.”–

Analysis:
Destruction of a NATO-Trained Army: There is no definitive public evidence or credible reports from established sources that Russia has completely destroyed a single NATO-trained Ukrainian army unit. Ukraine has received extensive training from NATO countries, especially since 2014, but the Ukrainian military is not organized into distinct “armies” in this context; rather, it includes various brigades, battalions, and other units which have been trained by NATO forces. Different units have been involved in combat, and while losses have occurred, the notion of an entire “army” being destroyed is an oversimplification or exaggeration of the situation.
Near Destruction of Another: Similarly, there’s no clear evidence that a second such “army” is on the verge of being destroyed. Ukrainian forces have faced significant challenges, including high casualties and equipment losses, but they continue to operate and resist Russian advances in various fronts, with ongoing support from NATO in terms of training, equipment, and intelligence.
Conclusion: This statement appears to be an exaggeration or misrepresentation of the ongoing conflict dynamics. While Russian forces have engaged and inflicted damage on Ukrainian units, including those trained by NATO, the idea of completely destroying entire armies in this context does not align with available reports or military analyses.

Reply addressees: @YorkshlreHiker