We thought the hundred years war was bad. But it turns out that the two century

We thought the hundred years war was bad. But it turns out that the two century war to end agrarian empires and convert (evolve) the world to industrial technological nation states free of previous wars hasn’t been completed. Why? The anglos are european and presume settlement and mutual adaptation and reconciliation. This is a distinctly european behavior of small states dependent upon trustworthy alliances projected on ancestral empires dependent upon trustless control that populate the rest of the world.
Russia is dying. Iran is closing on restoration of its heritage. China’s communist party prevented the fragmentation and conversion of china into it’s natural nine or more nations. But china has, we think, burned it’s population.
From my perspective we are in an endurance race to see which demographic population can restore its birth rates, and create a homoegenous enough politiy to possess shared strategy, values and culture to survive.
It is quite possible nobody wins.
And a dark age follows.
It’s happened repeatedly before.
Bronze age middle east, Iron Age Rome, Middle age India, Modern Age China.