THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR RUNCIBLE AI WORK AND MAINSTREAM AI WORK E

THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR RUNCIBLE AI WORK AND MAINSTREAM AI WORK

Economics, as an extension of physics, and equal to physics in its demand for acquisition in support equilibration sufficient to defeat entropy as a means of persistence, is the only viable system of thought and terminology for the production of rational, possible, ethical, moral, and liable and therefore restitutable behavior.
It’s the only means of commensurable exchange of information serving equally accessible means of reasoning between human neural networks and machine neural networks.
The fact that the fields of math, programming, and the hard sciences are ‘stuck’ on cardinality and ordinality reducible to quantities, rather than natural indexing is the reason this is not understood in the field.
In Runcible we use the same techniques used in court which is to test first principles and all of them are reducible to economic terms and totally absent any moral framing or bias.
For measurement we use natural indexing by sequences of terms, not unnatural (cardinal, ordinal) in indexing. This is effectively a system of supply and demand and relies on what is effectively marginal indifference in referential and transformal categories (see category theory in mathematics).
This is once again part of my consistent commentary that our work in the grammars has united the sciences into a single universally commensurable value neutral system of thought, ethics, politics and law. And that the present defect caused by academic siloing is spreading error in most fields faster than it can be corrected, despite the near abandonment of science in social sciences since the introgression of the frankfurt school of non-science into the american and western academy.