lol. Jon. Are those two statements necessarily mutually exclusive? lol -hugs. Th

lol. Jon. Are those two statements necessarily mutually exclusive? lol -hugs.

The reducibility stack using “<” means the item to the right constitutes a larger field than the item to the left.
Which could be confusing since I use the same symbol to show scale as reducibility, thus confusing you and I assume a whole lot of other people. 😉

In fact, this is one of those criticisms
@AutistocratMS
levies at me frequently, as the symbols require understanding the context.

I suppose I could use “>, <“: greater than / less than and “<-, ->”: Follows From if I were disciplined.

I’ll skip the sarcastic side-trip into bondage and discipline, but let’s just say I have a natural resistance to discipline. 😉

lol -hugs