Our opinion is that the basics of our work can be taught anywhere from seventh to twelfth grade, and certainly in the first two years of college. But more importantly, we need our work taught in the first year of law school, and we need to provide incentives (they actually exist already) to police and obtain award for policing the judiciary and the state.
At present the napoleonic code in europe provides an administrative court for doing so. In our opinion, as demonstrated by the problems trump has had with lower courts unskilled in constitutional matters – only in procedure and code – this is a necessary restructuring of the court system. In part because the common law evolved when one could appeal to the local church, the local manor, the local city, the local sheriff, even the parliament, and eventually the king.
Theoretically our representatives and senators were to fulfill that role, but to suppress corruption we reduced tehir influence, and the centralization of power in washington requiring full time legislators there, has functionally left the people without a vehicle for protection from the state.
Of course our work at the institute seeks to remedy this situation through constitutional ‘completion’ more so than reform. In other words, the natural and common law are merely incompletely stated for handling the emergent scale. We seek to complete that law rather than ‘reform’ it. Even if the word ‘reform’ applies correction rather than completion.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-30 16:16:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1983930960321376326
Leave a Reply