OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM? I’m not positive yet but I believe we broke Yann LeCun’s objec

OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM?
I’m not positive yet but I believe we broke Yann LeCun’s objection that LLMs are not the path to AGI. In fact I’m almost certain. cc:
@ylecun

Yes, he’s right, that we require investment in an operational layer (actions), the way we’ve developed a calculating, computing, reasoning layers – and of course our ethics and testifying layers. (And we do it in one pass)
But I don’t see that as anything other than a training challenge.
Just want to record this date as when we ‘got there’. 😉