Interesting and legitimate take – in that representation is generalized the the

Interesting and legitimate take – in that representation is generalized the the brain as physical relations. This isn’t what plato meant – it is what he should have meant. But a forgiving interpretation of him is as warranted as one of aristotle. The were headed in the right direction even if not precisely correct.

LLMs use words as measures and develop generalized concepts. Brains build from sense experience and disambiguate into referential precision with words. This means we should and do see convergence in llms and brains.

So the platonic realm is a deterministic production of neural representation rather than extant independent of it. This is plato’s ‘mistake’. But his point, in general otherwise was correct.

You are very smart so i could go into depth with you on this concept and it would be an interesting conversation.