NL is a science of decidability. This means that you can vary your legislation and regulation as you wish – you just cannot make false claims about the costs which you pay for those variations. Pluralism (as meant in anglo jurisprudence) is certainly possible. It may be beneficial. And it may be reciprocal. That does not mean that there are costs for all variations from NL over time. International law tends to evolve toward NL simply because that’s all that ‘s both rational, arguable, and enforceable. In that sense we are already demonstrating NL’s effectiveness.
I created this rather large edifice for the purpose of preventing lying. In particular the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequences of seduction into sedition (baiting into hazard) by the false promise of freedom from the laws of nature.
NL makes no such promise and it effectively outlaws such claims.
However, it preserves the utility of variation from NL – just not fase promise of the consequences of it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-21 01:35:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936236444986785972
Leave a Reply