An accusation without explanation. How is it a naturalistic fallacy? It’s simply

An accusation without explanation. How is it a naturalistic fallacy? It’s simply observed human behavior and explanation of that behavior as an optimum means of non-provocation of retaliation and thus cooperation which produces discounts on everything for everyone. What is the counter argument?


Source date (UTC): 2025-06-21 17:26:53 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936475926830989635

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *