Quite a few of them. There is a video on it on our YT channel under The Method p

Quite a few of them. There is a video on it on our YT channel under The Method playlist, and in the videos covering “Terms”.
https://
youtube.com/watch?v=VqhkEP
mhXLw&list=PLnyifULzMnvkreeTqzEOBaAW4f0oWy0B4
…

Though I think you misunderstand: “Disambiguation by operationalization, serialization, and adversarialism” – it means we make definitions unambiguous and non overlapping so that they are ‘deflationary’ (non inflationary and closed to ambiguity).

This is part of ensuring that when we speak we are doing so commensurably because our terms are commensurable. And it defends against most sophistry by substitution, conflation, and inflation.

To test truth we test the testifiability of the ten or so dimensions humans can possibly testify to. So between the unambiguousness of terms, the truth test, the reciprocity test, and the first principles exposed by the ternary logic of evolutionary computation, we can pretty much test every statement for whether it’s a possible truth claim – and better – we can determine the motive to deceive if one claims the unjustifiable as true.