Great question. But it’s just that you’re new to my work and the work of the fel

Great question. But it’s just that you’re new to my work and the work of the fellows as the institute. (Natural Law Institute) so you’re dropping into the middle of a discourse that’s confusing:

1) The claim of a Natural Law to which man can optimally adhere (a science of cooperation) has evolved through a number of logical constraints over the millennia.

So, just as in:
[animism > mythology > theology > philosophy > Empiricism > Science > Operationalism];

We also see:
[Aristotle’s natural law (Observable) > Aquinas’ Natural Law (Supernatural) > Founder’s (Blackstone) Natural Law (Ratio-Empirical) > Doolittle’s Natural Law (Scientific and Computational)].

So in the sense we mean it we’re talking about a Science of Decidability applied to human cooperation resulting in a Natural Law, that is strictly constructed from the first principles (laws of nature) of evolutionary computation (evolution).

I hope that helps.
CD