James Lindsay is one of those upper proletarians who finds self image and status

James Lindsay is one of those upper proletarians who finds self image and status in the pretense of morality and insight, when instead he’s just another attention seeking practitioner of feminine marxist critique, and the female means of adversarial undermining (“GSRRM”), simply applied to the more radical wing of his left biased demographic of pseudo intellectuals.
As a critical book reviewer explaining the radical’s thoughts, he’s shown capability and we must give credit where credit is due. But ss someone with personal knowledge wisdom and character sufficient to compose arguments, recommendations, and solutions – rather than feminine Gossiping Shaming Ridicule, Rallying and Moralizing in lieu of rational debate, he’s an utter failure by every measure. The left and women’s mass institutionalization of GSRRM has so normalized the technique we no longer view it as the fraud that it is.
The Woke-Right nonsense he’s propagating is merely another feminine abrahamic marxist-sequence technique of “distraction-by-rolling-accusation” to evade the great difference between the rebellion of left and right. The left and right like the female status seeking and male status seeking consist of the left search for unearned consumption, irresponsibility and unaccountability and the right search for earned capitalization, responsibility and accountability that they cannot achieve in the current social, economic, and political order.
These problems are solvable through (a) reciprocity – exchanges, (a) truthful speech, (b) transparent argument and debate (c) rational policy modifications.
The feminine always fears being left behind or missing out. The masculine fears being unable to demonstrate competency and value, and inability to form or participate in a tribe capable of securing mates.
It’s not complicated.
James is just another ‘Fictionalist” using the feminine abrahamic marxist sequence of verbal mythicism which we call one of the four fictionalisms:
1) Imaginary: occult to mythology to theology to secular theology.
2) Verbal: sophistry to idealism to ideology
3) Physical: magic to alchemy to pseudoscience
4) Operational: divination to fortune telling to innumeracy.
and Critique:
5)
A fictionalist at best is guilty of the pretense of knowledge, on the average guilty of deception, and when it involves the manipulation of the organis of the state, it’s just another category of fraud.Snake oil for the Nitwittery advanced by the Midwittery.

So yes, our good friend Josh Lisec is correct – in spades.

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.

Reply addressees: @JoshuaLisec