Well, the analogy is that if I shove you, it’s not going to hurt you. A slap mig

Well, the analogy is that if I shove you, it’s not going to hurt you. A slap might offend you but it’s not going to hurt you. Well, those are direct means of offense. Where GSRRM is indirect means of offense. The question is whether you caused someone harm. If you caused them harm it’s a crime. The question is whether we want to insure people against that category of crime. In the past we didn’t because ‘corrective violence’ was an accepted part of life. But with the inclusion of women in male spaces, in the workforce, in institutions, and in politics we have deprecated our ability to use corective violence to solve matters of ‘soft harms’. Unfortunately, women produce ‘soft harms’ at industrial scale when not policed, and this has worked its way (particularly through the more jewish institutions like the frankfurt school) and their dominance in the chattering classes of media, it’s become a problem that may require legislation to correct. So we either restore ‘corrective violence’ or we implement laws that are a much more costly version of it.

Reply addressees: @Archaic3one