Alec; Well done. In our work (NLI) we explain your hypothesis and what to do abo

Alec;
Well done. In our work (NLI) we explain your hypothesis and what to do about it as a failure of a system of measurement, a failure of visibility, and a failure of our defensive institutions (courts) to police those ‘talking classes’ that you’ve listed. In addition we’ve ‘scienced’ into a formal logic their means of what is fundamentally fraud, by the use of suggestion, overloading, Ignorance error, bias, wishful thinking, magical thinking, and deceit. And we’ve ‘scienced’ the biological causes of both why they behave they do, and why their frauds are satisfy the human market demand for evasion of responsibility.
Why am I saying this? Because I want to confirm that you’re insight is correct and we can back it up.

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @AlecStapp