Yes. In order to maintain universal commensurability at all scales we start with

Yes. In order to maintain universal commensurability at all scales we start with charge potential (+/-), stable equilibria ( =) as cooperation, persistence and gain, and ‘below the base of the triangle (!=) for collapse or loss. When we focus on losses we use a diamond for this reason. Otherwise we stick with the triangle (ternary logic).
And we then ‘solve’ for the relations (how they fit into +/-/=/!=). we’ve found this leads to consistent identification of causality and expression of before-during-after states.
This manifests as feminine consumption/seduction, masculine production/force and ascendant male trade/cooperation.
Now, just as in the Godel Escher Bach book cover illustration, that doesn’t mean we can’t ‘rotate’ this basic shape, or buld dimensions upon it, so that we can express something else entirely. But since we’re trying to expose universal commensurability and universal causality then we solve for the triangle first, and then we simply describe the additional dimensions that influence that set of relations.
In this way we expose the consistency of the ternary logic of the universe, expose the first principles, and then document the dimensions and consequences of those relations at that scale.
Cheers

Reply addressees: @Turbo_Flux