I would say that the ternary logic of the universe expressed as evolutionary com

I would say that the ternary logic of the universe expressed as evolutionary computation, tells us that opposites (the points of the triangle) are necessary CONSTRAINTS (limits) by the other two points of the triangle, regardless of which point you start from. This is because the universe cannot predict or think, and only remember by physical, genetic, or knowledge representation. As such the logic of the universe is that men and women divide both the population and time dimensions of labor, with intelligence maximizing the adaptability and range of conversion of energy (consumption), and the sexes and ages limiting one another.
As such yes, women are not competent at scale since their sensory system is insufficient for it, even if hyper dense compared to the male at present experiential evaluation.
Therefore men must constrain women in politics just as women must constrain men in families and social groups.
I had previously assumed we could produce a house of women, and that we could add meritocratic tests for both voting and for political position. I am increasingly unsure given the demonstration of women’s behavior worldwide. Normally I seek to solve a problem through establishing an equilibrium but I’m losing confidence that it’s possible.
Women are not self aware nor competent at scale or rather too few are at too high risk to consider it.
And no I don’t like that which is why I’m still trying to solve the problem by resisting it.

Reply addressees: @truthb4face