Not sure. There is a point of marginal indifference in understanding the logic o

Not sure. There is a point of marginal indifference in understanding the logic of the universe. I haven’t found anything new in a very long time. And I’m aligned with Perimeter in that I think we have exacerbated our errors and instead we know enough to bring closure.
Even so, knowing the fundamental laws does not mean one can predict the combinatorics that emerge from them. I suspect, that just as there are only so many possible elements, there may be only so many possible assemblies (molecules on up). But for human purposes it’s the equivalent of infinity – up to the point of the limits of energy to retain stable organization (persistence).

Reply addressees: @Thinkson_27 @maximumpain333