I’ll probably submit it or at least post on ArXive. I do not expect wide acceptance. But I have felt that the point needed to be made, and made in the style and format (grammar) they are familiar with. The criticism will consist of four points I already understand. And I expect the majority to fail to grasp the argument, despite that its not really that complicated: a classical explanation given our current knowledge of the quantum background (zero point) defines causality simply and opens up clear venues for closure by investigation. I have intuitions after writing this why two of the numbers vary. So I think I have and can make my case. I just have too much work already. 🙁
Reply addressees: @GestaltedApe
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-25 18:30:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904601823748726784
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904531983172043199
Leave a Reply