No, I am teaching you the method of argument by unambiguous chains of causation

No, I am teaching you the method of argument by unambiguous chains of causation instead of pretense of argument justified by selective analogy.

Either you are knowledgeable enough to make an argument from first principles (first causes) and to trace the evolution of these ideas across time, or you are just ‘fitting’ examples to justify your hypothesis.

You are a good person. I can easily detect that. But my job is the truth whether we like it or not.

The truth is that and any good that came to be under the church was the good that would arise from any government at all, just as the common law arose under the Romans. The only difference is whether it’s empirical (european) or a lie (semitic abrahamic).

The church destroyed knowledge that took the return of the muslims fleeing from fundamentalism to return that knowledge to europe. Which,, in 1200 started our recovery immediately, and despite the plague, gave us literacy and the printing press within a few generations, science within a few more, and the agrarian then industrial revolution in a few more.

Abrahamism is a cancer.

Reply addressees: @ProductionMan @MikeChardin