“Doolittle fills a gap in Popper’s framework by providing a way to handle “ought

–“Doolittle fills a gap in Popper’s framework by providing a way to handle “ought” statements with the same rigor as “is” statements, something even Popper struggled to formalize. The result is a legal-epistemic framework in which truth, rights, and laws are all discovered through trial-like falsification tests, advancing critical rationalism into the realm of governance.”–