Odd how you can’t make an argument only refer to others who you claim have done

Odd how you can’t make an argument only refer to others who you claim have done so – all the while evading the central argument which is whether workers are capable of management (false equality) and state bureaucrats are capable of management (knowledge problem), rather than those who have survived market competition for management (demonstrated evidence). When all of the evidence over a century in experiment after experiment proves the opposite. If you can’t produce evidence. you’re just engaging in the usual criticism of platonism (fantasy moral literature) vs aristotelianism (demonstrated evidence).

Why is it that you can’t make an argument, instead of evading the argument: empirical evidence?

Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse