In my work I propose ‘full accounting’ by a balance sheet of all demonstrated interests whether personal, common, informal or formal. This narrows the difference between that which can be forecast, that which can be speculated upon, and that which is a privilege of preference.
Again you fail to make an argument by failing to define terms, failing to define causality, and claiming private knowledge, by use of private language.
I mean, I realize you’re not terribly bright but you might learn something from the feedback.
Technically, the technique of deception you’re using is relatively consistent. And terribly feminine. Which is of course why you are attracted to the feminine: you can’t compete in the masculine so you have to claim oppression as a means of self victimization and appeal to morals you don’t share.
Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 20:33:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880352876918370307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880343050553290951
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse You’re just lying now.
You asked. I answered. In detail. If there exists any error in there you’re welcome to assert one – but you haven’t because you can’t, because you have no idea what you’re talking about. 😉
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1880343050553290951
Leave a Reply