“Fascism is the terroristic dictatorship of finance capital. That’s naff all to

–“Fascism is the terroristic dictatorship of finance capital. That’s naff all to do with socialism.”–

Hmm…. Fascism served as a rebellion against competitors: financialism (Jewish), liberalism (Englism), Democratic Socialism (French) and communism (Jewish-Russian), by a competitively superior polity, academy, and economy, that sought to redirect resources to defense of the polity given the previous french conquest of europe and the present russian-jewish-communist conquest of europe, where anglo liberalism and french democratic socialism were insufficient in authority to organize a state for such post napoleonic ‘Total War’.

In effect Fascism was an application of historical roman governance that varied between authoritarianism at war, and oligarchy at peace.

So, rather than enabling financialism, fascism sought to destroy the power of capitalists to act as internationalists or factionalists at the expense of polity – especially the working classes who had finally been economically liberated from subsistence agrarianism by the industrial revolution, but whose search for replacing that security were urgent, and therefore desirous and demanding of protections in their era as the middle class had been in the enlightenment era’s age of commerce and sail.

The problem for labor is darwinian: the classes were and remain sorted by capacity to bear responsibility for increasing complexity. In other words, classes sort by IQ and Conscientiousness, with limited rotation out of the lower middle and middle given the heterogeneity of genetic expression without careful mate selection.

This is why workers, even in the one case of supposed worker ownership, do not participate even if they can, and even if they exist in market conditions that tolerate a lack of innovation.

Workers lack competency. They are not oppressed.

Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TyrantsMuse @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele