WM. I am not some trivial nitwit. 😉 I’m merely contributing to the conversation

WM. I am not some trivial nitwit. 😉 I’m merely contributing to the conversation. The subjective is in fact a meaningful method of argument where subjective preference has value in the action or decision. The objective is in fact a method of argument when attempting to determine a system of measurement for deciding matters of conflict between the subjective.
The first principle of the difference between left and right originates in the sex differences in cognition and valence. This subject is a canonical example of the feminine subjective empathic in-time risk and responsibility evading and oppression appealing vs the masculine objective systematizing over-time risk-tolerant responsibility-seeking and conspiracy appealing differences in perception valence preference and advocacy. This is basic neuroscience with universal application. Unfortunately, the ‘woke’ nonsense is falling into the subjective frame which obscures the fact that the left is objectively engaging in attempted seduction into false promise, baiting into hazard, using female methods of sedition, in order to steal, while hiding under pretense of innocence and compassion. In other words … the right is correct and objectively moral and the left is not. This isn’t an opinion. It’s simply a fact of the sex differences in cognition. The problem is that we have never been in a condition before where the government could be used as aproxy for males to forward the female means of parasitism, sedition, and warfare, and the experiment has run its course.
All other discourse, including the ‘woke’ nonsense, is just application of the female means of undermining as a means of evading the polarity of the morality of the sex differences. In other words, “gossiping rallying and shaming, ridiculing, outraging, rallying, moralizing, and psychologizing’ which is the female method (and which James makes use of daily, is just a means of distraction from the underlying causality of attempted theft (organize crime by institutional means) and it’s opposite; the right’s policing of it. Unfortunately parasitism sells and responsibility doesn’t. An argument from which universal enfranchisement cannot recover. Either you are capable of bearing the burden of responsibility for self others and commons or you are a parasite upon others – and a criminal.

Reply addressees: @WolfMcNally