I start from selfish and merely state that cooperation is one of three choices.

I start from selfish and merely state that cooperation is one of three choices. Predation, cooperation, boycott. I only refer to cooperation to produce evolutionary computation as a means of decidability. As I have stated before in response to your objection we should address all three choices and state the value if each. The missing concept I think as we discussed this morning is capital and full accounting.

You don’t want me to test your reasoning by testing your incentives. So if I don’t I must limit my response to the search for decidability by the identification of limits. Cooperation cannot be defeated. Only its terms given present and future capital.

I keep wondering if I have failed with this group because when I shifted from libertarian philosophy using popperian analytic philosophy’s methodology to science operationalism and behavioral science I think I left behind a lot of people who are not seeing the Closure the system provides. So again I have failed because I haven’t explained the difference. Even in the book I assumed too much. So that’s three things in three days I realize are obvious to me and not to others.

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS