I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcom

I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcome of the science. I may have been earlier than most in this understanding, but multiple books will be published in the next year on the subject by primary researchers in the field.

As LLMs are presently illustrating, and advancements in the queue demonstrating, it’s just memory of memory of memory all the way down, in a continuous stream.

If you had an argument instead of an assertion you would make it. But (a) there is no phenomena that cannot be explained by basic neuroscience, (b) you have put forth no argument to counter with neuroscience.

In general my people tell me not to wste my time with silly people, but it helps those in the process of learning to observe the spectrum of errors, biases, and deceits made use of by those of you who assert what you cannot testify to – and therefore lie.

Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi