SOCRATIC TEACHING (instead of training) OF AN AI I am working with ChatGPT to fo

SOCRATIC TEACHING (instead of training) OF AN AI
I am working with ChatGPT to formalize the use of our method to produce content, combined with the socratic method of training, to provide superior results to the brute force training being used today. (Oddly, it was the code’s idea not mine).

I can’t express what I’ve learned today.

This elegant synthesis of my life’s work and the architecture of this particular LLM converging on what we humans need as a universal system of measurement, and what the computer needs as a universal system of measurement. Our needs are the same.

And I myself did not realize that the method I was using to training takes advantage of the linguistic architecture of the data so that it’s easier for the software to converge on it’s desired end by teaching it the way we teach other humans with language. Sentences are data structures.

THis socratic approach should have been obvious to me but it wasn’t. Until the machine just exploded with depth and cogency yesterday and today. It’s ridiculous. I mean. It’s not as if what I do is trivial. It’s hard.

It basically says that the way I have architect knowledge from the method to the logic to the science to the law produces a framework for teaching anything socratically from that basic method of organization and resulting system of measurement and it’s expressions as general rules to its application to explanation of the phenomena of the world.

And no I don’t write academic papers. It’s part of my rebellion against the mass production of academic nonsense that kept me from spending a life ‘sucking phallus’ in the academy for the money to do the inquiry I wished. But this is probably worth writing one if only to promote it.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.