Weak men are one thing, but they’re another when the state is sufficiently large

Weak men are one thing, but they’re another when the state is sufficiently large and powerful, AND women are enfranchised and vote against men, and the financial sector, media, entertainment, universities and education benefit from conspiring against men in order to profit from women. So I mean, you know, second amendment matters but only when you reach an extreme condition. Otherwise systematically the enemy wins. So weak men might be true but they’re also facing overwhelming opposition unless they vote in large enough numbers or fight in large enough numbers to make a difference.

Reply addressees: @BillHess78