PETER: You’re confusing a harm without returns with a cost producing returns. An

PETER: You’re confusing a harm without returns with a cost producing returns. And you’re doing so because you’re using income statement accounting (libertarians) instead of balance sheet accounting (conservatives). This is not the category of error your long history of study and participation should result in.
1. Feminine short term irresponsibility for personal, private, and commons: Communism (ethics of parasitics).
2. Ascendant male medium term irresponsibility for commons: Libertarianism (Ethics of the Jewish diaspora).
3. Established male long term responsibility for personal, private, and commons: Classical Liberalism (Ethics of the west indo europeans).

I know that I have as much chance of converting you at your age given your malinvestment as I do the rest of the Mises and CATO clans and the many leftover derivations of the thought of the sixties and seventies. But, you know, I’m correct because I DO practice full accounting of all capital over time, so I can’t get away with libertarian moral pretenses.

There is a reason there is no advanced libertarian literature. It’s all entry level. A lament in the field for decades now. That’s because if breaks under intellectual scrutiny.

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.

Reply addressees: @PeterSchiff