The whole trick is knowing what you want out of it, and just asking the question

The whole trick is knowing what you want out of it, and just asking the question so that it composes the text for you. It doesn’t work if you don’t effectively tell it what you want to say. In this case I gave it:

“I know this sounds ridiculous, but we have never encountered a meaningful counter argument other than: Skepticism in the forms of: 1. It’s word salad. 2. It’s difficult so it mustn’t be true. 3. if you can’t explain it simply it can’t be true. 4. it’s too much work to learn enough to determine whether it’s true. 5. I’m too entrenched in my frame to learn a different one. 6. I don’t believe that universal commensurability is possible. 7. I don’t trust your motives because (some desire to preserve self image, social status, ideology, social construction, preference, and most importantly, relativism.). So what counter arguments other than these can you imagine from the work we’ve produced?(Recognizing that we’re only covering one chapter, even if we’ve uploaded the entire book, and this book is but one of a series.)

So I told it what to say and it just elaborated it for me. Which is pretty useful. 😉

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS