You are asserting something with confidence in a field of enormous complexity an

You are asserting something with confidence in a field of enormous complexity and in which I’m the primary theorist. If instead you police what is testifiable – which is what we do in court – and what is not irreciprocal, and what is not in pursuit of ill motive of irreciprocity. The effective result is that all truth claims are testable, and, the sciences are sufficiently complete that we can determine the tesifiablility of nearly anything worth speaking falsely about.

Now you may have great confidence about this but we have been trying to find fault with this system for more than a decade and we can’t find anything at all that is a matter of conflict that is not decidable under it.

Reply addressees: @BVanzytveld @MiriamEckhart @Sassafrass_84