THE FBI CAN’T THINK? RE: Now there is quite a bit of difference between the olde

THE FBI CAN’T THINK?
RE: https://t.co/KMF0xNMSni
Now there is quite a bit of difference between the older FBI who are basically just ‘cops’ and the younger FBI who is more savvy to the world as it is today, and in particular the impact of and use of social media.

Apparently the FBI believed that this post constituted one of the following:
(a) an inspiration to violence
(b) a threat of violence
(c) an attempt to organize violence

Instead of:
(a) A civil war is a deterministic outcome in the next few years, as no civilization or state in history has survived this level of overproduction of elites, asymmetry of returns and resulting inequality, debt, immigration, conversion, conquest, and radical shift in economic competitiveness, trade, and geostrategic power to defend that trade. And no serious intellectual who has mastered the discipline disagrees with this determinacy. In fact, throughout history back to the greeks, said one way or another they are in perfect agreement.

(b) The elites have, and the state has, gradually, through folly, egoism, ideology, conspiracy, and judicial activism, gradually undermined the constitution, the common law, and the implied traditions that sought to prevent these crimes – and they are in fact crimes. ANd they have done so by hiding under moral pretense that the elimination of responsibility and the centralization of power will produce other than the destitution that it has wherever put in practice.

(c) And I, and our organization have produced a list of those crimes, a list of reforms to the constitution to prevent their repetition, and a list of reforms and policies to reverse their harms – and in doing so produce the greatest reforms and restoration of freedom, agency, self determination, and wealth to the population since the Roman Reforms. There is no possible argument whether legal, practical, or moral to fail to implement these reforms without admitting to criminality among the elites.

(d) The ‘elites’ (finance, media, academy, state) have no possible means of producing their own incentives to reform. We have exhausted debate because of institutional capture. We have exhausted voting because of demographic collapse and replacement, we have exhausted the legislature. All that remains is the court, and the court by a small margin. We lack a monarchy as “judge of last resort” that the founders and their english predecessors used to settle their grievances. And as such after the court, we have only the institution of the people, who, by reformation, by protest, and rebellion to demand it, by revolution to implement it, or descent into primitive house to house ever escalating civil war – at the same time as our geostrategic power, and our international trade, collapse our economies, and let loose the was of aggression the remaining imperialists (russia, china, iran) seek to use for expansion.

(e) Therefore it is left to the people to use the LEGAL and MORAL means, as did our founders, of a common law suit against the state for the redress of grievances, it’s submission to congress (parliament), and it’s prosecution in the court (supreme court). And if that justice fails us, to use the last means of our insurance – the force of arms to address those grievances – which is the reason for the first and second amendments. And our duty to one another under it, the common law under it, one another, and nature and nature’s god under it, to insure those laws of man and nature. They are the foundations upon which all the rest of the constitution, our country, our civilization, and our people rests.

(f) As such, my purpose, our purpose as an organization, is to prevent a civil war and it’s bloody and horrid consequences for us, our country, our civilization, and by extension the world, by (i) a moral license to demand change (ii) a set of solutions to implement that change (iii) a plan of orderly transition to bring about that change (iv) and a means of coercion of the elites (including threat of force if necessary), to bring about justice for all, the suppression of the elites’ criminality against our people, the restitution if possible of predations upon our people, and a restoration and reformation of the law and policy to prevent the future repetition of these crimes against our people – thereby continuing the long process of incremental suppression of the criminality of elites as we evolve the scale, complexity, and wealth of our nations and our civilization.

No moral person can argue against this and not self incriminate.
It is the science.
It is the natural law.
It’s the common law.
It’s historical tradition in our law.
It’s the source of our constitutions and our law.
And it is the just reformation of our government and those who conspire with it against the people to once again force it to conform to our constitution, our common law, the natural law, and the science of human cooperation.

That’s my and our opinion.
And we stand by it.
As every right, just, moral, person should.
And as every free person must.

And the fact that they send a ‘cop’ to discuss such matters with me instead of a group of constitutional lawyers is something that must end. All it achieves is confirming that we have people who can exercise power, without the knowledge under which to exercise or constrain it – or who violate it anyway because of ignorance or ideology.

And all action against me would achieve is giving me evidence, standing in court, a platform, and legitimacy with which to reach an even broader range of people.

And in doing so, instead of achieving our ambition of a peaceful reformation, give inspiration to the random retaliatory and escalatory circles of violence that is the most certain means by which the civil war will emerge in modernity. Not as the American or English or French civil wars, but like the more recent house-to-house civil wars.

And a military that is currently too small to contain the predictable remains of the axis of authoritarian empires currently reasserting itself, and is four losses and zero wins against civil wars by these means by men in flip-flops, combined with the 14K FBI agents, the three police departments that alone have some chance of enforcing order, and a national guard that is more than likely to agree with the moral demands, cannot, compete, nor can a government survive delegitimization by firing on people with moral demands.

On January 6th, had someone like myself (who planned to) merely taken the floor in congress to demand freedom of speech and protection of political affiliation as we do religion, race, and sex, so that we might continue the debate on how to resolve our differences rather than suppress them and drive us to conflict and civil war, we might have changed the narrative enough to end the people’s resistance to one another, and to restore the people against the predatory elites, and work toward reforms.

But with that opportunity missed. The clock ticks toward a deterministic end. And only the hard work of moral men will save us.

I work within the law – but that’s because I know and understand the law. How many in ‘law enforcement’ the legislature, or even the courts do?

CD
NLI