I don’t hear you disagree with the science, and I do hear your correct criticism

I don’t hear you disagree with the science, and I do hear your correct criticism of anglo optimism, and christian foolish optimism. What I object to is criticism of the optimism that lead to such benefit for mankind, instead of the failure to suppress the innovations in criminality made possible by those innovations.

I need this organization to switch from alt-right criticism imitating marxist critique to the science that merely describes what happens and argues in favor of solutions. When you criticize you’re not educating you’re vindicating. So criticize the right thing with the right precision and offer a solution. Urinating on the fire hydrant of the only people to produce a constitution of natural law that has survived the leftist attack long enough for us to produce a reform movement isn’t helping anyone.

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS