Data is data. Sorry. IQ test data is exhaustive. Also, while you may not know th

Data is data. Sorry. IQ test data is exhaustive.

Also, while you may not know this, mathematics can be performed as a language or as a model. The sexes differ in mathematical cognition in this fashion. (Verbal-pictoral vs spatial mechanical).

During the early part of the last century, there was an open discussion of this problem, and that it was evident in physics, economics, and mathematics (“jewish physics”, “jewish economics”). This is most popularly obvious in the work of cantor, bohr, and einstein, who reversed the european restoration of mathematics under Descartes.

In fact, the failure of physics over the past seventy plus years can be attributed to this ‘catastrophe’, and the absence of modeling in physics and its replacement with what in economics we call ‘mathiness’.

Which is odd, given that the problem in economics is understanding this issue while still using the wrong calculus for economic analysis.

There are a small number of people working on this problem but they are coming from computer science (operationalism) instead of mathematics and physics.

Computation requires modeling. My work directly and Wolfram in application, address this problem.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @BIackColdbrew