1. To the OP I have explained the “epistemic” (science of) feminine left consumi

1. To the OP I have explained the “epistemic” (science of) feminine left consuming in-time, masculine right capitalizing over time;

2. –“Okay but what makes your “theory” more factual than this persons”–
I answered your use of postmodern sophistry of relativism by stating a fact requires a theory – a hierarchy of theories.
I provided the foundations of the theory of political differences as largely genetic, or like religion, by indoctrination.
I suspect the depth of those two statements might be non obvious to you and require explanation.

3. –“… use ad homin attacks and appeal to intellect …”–
Because you begin with false premises of wants and your opposition begins with the masculine premise of demonstrated behavior, both of you think the other is lacking in intelligence, while you think them oppressive and they think you thieves (parasites). (BTW: no criticism, but it’s ad hominem, oft shortened to ad hom.)

In summary its easy to call one another stupid when ones premises about the universe and mankind are polar opposites.

However conservatives are demonstrably correct in human behavior, the four sets of laws of the universe, economics, and Law. Progressives are only correct about ambitions and feelings. Why? masculine systematizing over time vs feminine empathizing in time.

ie: genetics.

Reply addressees: @matherspolitico @NotKLM @Will63541 @KaleWontSaveYou @LittleMammith