“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think it’s a sign

–“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think it’s a sign of an immature woman not all women.”– Stephen Smith (@SteveSailorMan)
Yes, it’s a sign of immature women in particular, and Women on x behaving this way demonstrate high neuroticism – what we’d expect.
However, all women, under pressure, will at least demonstrate some fraction of this behavior, as will a minority of cognitively feminine men. Almost all women demonstrate the naxalt-axalt fallacy. And a supermajority demonstrate the inversion of true-false with desirable-undesirable.
But this argument requires context: Please remember that I am trying to explain the origins and ‘logic’ of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist-sequence of seditions that constitute the feminine means of antisocial behavior, underming, sedition, and treason.
So my ’emphasis’ serves the purpose of attempting to sensitize the audience of followers, their friends, and associates such that they learn to both identify it, and most importantly, realize it is an instinctual response that can be given voice as a pretense of argument using the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence – yet that we can suppress that antisociality and criminality just as we have that of violence with the law. The problem is male antisociality is obvious, but female antisociality is seditious and incremental, which we can see from the evolution of the feminist movement on one hand, and the evolution of the cultural marxist to race marxist to work sequence on the other.

Affections
CD

Reply addressees: @SteveSailorMan