Michael (all); The point you’re making is illustrating the difference between ma

Michael (all);
The point you’re making is illustrating the difference between mathematics constructed as a language of sets (ideal) vs mathematics as a language of correspondence (real).
And that the problems that have emerged in mathematics and by externality with physics have arisen because of that idealism and the externalization of its consequences – of instead of retention of the representation of mathematical relations as consistent and correspondent whether physical or verbal causal limits – it’s all just names relations comparisons and agreements.
So again, by Cantor, Bohr, and Einstein (as well as others) reversing Descartes, and re-platonizing mathematics, we have seen consequences in all disciplines from physical to philosophy, and even (in my field) behavioral and macro economics.
I am not sure just how much of the ‘decline’ in progress is due to this set of ignorance and error producing very profound metaphysical presumptions in all other fields – a general decline in the ability to think clearly.

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @Plinz