Basic criticism is that rothbardian ethics are jewish ethics of the pale, escapi

Basic criticism is that rothbardian ethics are jewish ethics of the pale, escaping responsibility for commons on the one hand and leaving open usury and baiting into hazard, and evasion of liabilty on the other.

Basic criticism of hoppe, is that his ethics are those of the german Free Cities – which like both the jews of the pale, or the german free cities, or every other libertarian ‘fantasy’ depend on an empire letting a commercial trading city self regulate as long as it pays taxes to the crown.

Both of these contrast with anglo ethics which require both commons, and self regulation, and self defense.

Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You