Mises ignored the commons, and not only physical commons, but especially informa

Mises ignored the commons, and not only physical commons, but especially informal and formal commons. Hayek demonstrated commons were an extraordinary asset, and that were the most important asset. And that wester civ outcompeted otehrs because of it’s high trust ability to build commons that reduced costs for all. So while Mises and rothbard are easy to understand they are also a false promise just as much as marxists propose a false promise.

Reply addressees: @femboy_swift