The most illogical argument against Israel, by defense of national sovereignty,

The most illogical argument against Israel, by defense of national sovereignty, is that the anglo-american purpose of the world wars was the end of empires by the CREATION of national sovereignty, natural rights, “human rights” and the constraint of governments to their borders and the economic and cultural improvement of their peoples so that we might prevent world wars (that china, russia, and iran seek to restore) by dominance over others who do not want such domination but national sovereignty – as we all do.

While the world war one and world war two (the wars of the end of empires) certainly made border decisions that were flawed, particularly in the ottoman empire that like the rest of the middle east NEVER had national sovereignty – but internecine brutality – israel was one of those decisions to provide a people with some chance of sovereignty.

Yet the muslims of the region were and still are, terrified by the presence of superior civilizations, superior cultures, superior institutions, and frankly, superior genetics frankly, that falsifies the nonsense that has kept them ignorant and despotic, in decline, unable to modernize, and dysgenic for over a thousand years since their mass conversion to fundamentalism. And the cancer of ignorance decay dysgenia and violence that islam has used to destroy every great civilization of the ancient world that has not resisted it.

So (a) there was no national sovereignty before europeans created it by ending the age of empires. (b) many borders were created amongst peoples who are politically irresponsible, culturally primitive, intellectual regressive, ignorant, and superstitious to attempt to bring them national sovereignty, rule of law, economic prosperity, and salvation from their ignorance and superstition. (c) Israel was one of those decisions and the evidence is that it is the only country in south eurasia capable of responsible governance, culturally evolutionary, economically prosperous, and the promise of what the rest of south eurasians could achieve without the politically irresponsible, culturally primitive, intellectual regressive, ignorant, and superstitious primitivism they live under still – despite the european, persian, hindustani, and now chinese efforts to civilize them in self defense against the cancer that is that backward culture and civilization. (d) the palestinians are apparently an unrecoverable population – no other arab states will tolerate they for the same reason the israelis won’t – and they are the easy pawns of Iran’s attempt to restore authoritarian primitivism of the caliphate (Empire) and the backwardness of theocracy upon peoples, some of whom are gradually evolving to escape it.

So any person of moral ambition for mankind can have any other interpretation.

Sorry.

Reply addressees: @RCantstopme @creaso14 @Jaketwist8