Interesting. This subject would make a great conversation. I suspect it would me

Interesting. This subject would make a great conversation. I suspect it would mean a difference in the definition of a religion. Sort of like the religion > philosophy > ideology > Empirical > operational sequence.
As you know I tend to decompose concepts to their first principles (causes) and so it’s possible that there is another rotation of the dimensions that could produce another interpretation.

I think whoever in this thread said Marxism was an anti-religion, is probably partly correct. In that religions are positive and aspirational while the abrahamic and marxist sequences are methods of warfare against masculinity and aristocracy.

So just as europeans and men use logic and testimony, the semitws and women use fictionalism and mythicism to undermine it..

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @SRCHicks