THE SOVIET SECULAR INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF FEMININE > JEWISH > ABRAHAMIC SOCIAL

THE SOVIET SECULAR INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF FEMININE > JEWISH > ABRAHAMIC SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF LYING
I have researched and documented the evolution of the feminine means of undermining, social construction, and inversion of objectively true/false with preferentially good/bad, through to the abrahamic religions and the marxist sequence.

But I underestimated the soviets as the first time an entire government had been capable of adopting the female strategy of social construction of undermining and sewing conflict using institutional organization of the use of modern communications to ‘uneducate’ people so to speak.

And it’s terrifying that this feminine means of coercion is so difficult to defend against in a high trust society like the west that favors free speech – under the presumption it’s not industrialized lying defended by the institutions of state, or organized religion (church, temple, universities).

And how difficult is defense against the feminine means of social warfare while preserving free speech, when the moral intuition of the masculine is paternal demand for individual responsibility and the feminine is to demand tolerance for irresponsibility, which only serves to bait a population into hazard, generate class conflict, and generate demand for authority, that as a consequence succeeds by eliminating freedom of speech that made that sedition and authority possible?

The only solution I know of is ‘free reciprocal and truthful speech that does not encourage irresponsibility for the private and common’ and as such does not sew the seeds of justification for discontent, bait people into hazard of irresponsibility, causing redistributive parasitism, generating demand for authority that reverses freedom of speech, sovereignty, reciprocity, responsibility, and voluntary cooperation, and the prosperity that would have resulted had those demands not been reversed.

Cheers
CD