Q: Curt: “Can you elaborate on the “equal suppression in law of female antisocia

–Q: Curt: “Can you elaborate on the “equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behaviour as that of men”?”—

Correct. While the common law of england included prohibitions on female antisocial behavior, (what I call GSRRM, which you can search for in my fee), the law against male behavior increased with male agency, rather rapidly after the years 700-1000 depending upon where you were in Europe. With “genetic pacification” being the result: hanging 1% of the population every generation, and war and disease taking care of the rest.
Conversely, women lacked agency until the industrial revolution. And we only integrated them into the labor force and the franchise (voting) after the first world war, and only massively into the work force and education after 1960.
So it took time for the traditional behaviors to dissipate and new generations to abandon them.
And it coincided with the movement of the marxist school from europe using class marxism, to the USA using race marxism (which means it’s just about those who lack productive ability seeking power, not about achieving good).
So with the success of the left in undermining our institutions beginning with our universities then our press, then our education system, it took time for the seditionist movements to do their work across generations, and the result has been the present set of crises.
In retrospect had we brought forward those common law prohibitions – most of which are interference, speech, ‘kings peace’, and liability related – then none of this would have been possible.
And as such the laws can be constructed to suppress the feminine antisocial behavior we’ve observed just as we incrementally suppressed the masculine antisocial behavior we observed a few centuries earlier as men were able to experiment tiven the new technologies of agrarian production, steel, ships, and gunpowder.

Sedition is women’s gunpowder, lies are their rifles, and pretense of victimhood and innocence their shields.

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @JimReckoning @WallStreetSilv