CHRISTIANITY, EUROPEAN RELIGIONS, AND THE COUNTER ARGUMENT AGAINST OTHER RELIGIO

CHRISTIANITY, EUROPEAN RELIGIONS, AND THE COUNTER ARGUMENT AGAINST OTHER RELIGIONS
The Christians, in an effort to produce cooperation, and suppress tribalism first, and clannishness second, succeeded in producing the nation-state, but those nations states were all within Christendom.

There is a reason religions reflect civilizations and civilizations reflect races – because race and civilization and planetary geography, are the maximum demographic and cultural and political organizations that can follow the same group strategy.

As such religions are always and will always consist of group strategies for states, federations, and civilizations that are relatively racially, civilizationally, culturally, and institutionally marginally indifferent.

And, even if say, christianity is the optimum religion of transition into a middle class majority polity, (just as buddhism and hinduism are a race to stagnation, and islam is a race to devolution to the bottom), that doesn’t mean that it won’t preserve the group evolutionary strategy of the people, because all it does is foster tolerance, forgiveness, trust, and mindfulness despite human instinct and intuitions.

Conversely there are no other religions, at least other than our native religions, even the new secular leftist religions, that are not contrary and hostile to our group evolutionary strategy.

For this reason tolerance for other religions in the home is one thing, but presence of these religions in the commons is nothing more than warfare against our commons.

As such, while we do not want the self interest of the state to interfere in our European religious spectrum, that does not mean that we need tolerate, permit, and not outlaw those religions that are hostile to our civilizations.

Affections
CD