Hans’ argument here is nonsense, despite humorous, and succeeding in making his

Hans’ argument here is nonsense, despite humorous, and succeeding in making his point, Hoppe is German, Mises, Friedman and Rothbard are Jewish, and Hayek is german cum english, and I”m anglo American – classical liberals.
Each of us brought our cultures and our cultural means of argument to the counter-revolution against the marxist-sequence seditious invasion.
If we start from the recognition that these Jewish authors were from the Jewish separatist diasporic culture, Hoppe influenced by the german city state culture, and Hayek(eventually) and myself from the classical liberal culture, then in this discussion Hoppe seeks to cast classical liberals (Hayek) as leftists rather than Jews then Germans, then anglos increasingly successful at developing institutions of social, economic, intellectual political, military, and geostrategic expertise at scale.
Now, Mises and Rothbard are correct that libertarianism is superior for the upper middle and middle classes, just as communism and socialism for the lower middle, working and lower classes. Hoppe is correct in that his city state or even village-state anarchism is better for the middle and working classes. And hayek (and I) is correct for all classes in maximizing the size of the middle class.
With unfortunately, Hoppe being correct that it is democracy, or at least the introduction of those without demonstrated capacity for both productivity, and responsibility for more than just themselves into the voting pool. With, the rather obvious rapid deceleration by the inclusion of women in the voting pool.
So regardless of how it’s said, Hayek (and I) recommend expansion of rule of law of natural law – Hayek by recognition of informal capital (which Hoppe and Rothbard and Mises ignore, despite property being an informal capital), and myself expanding the law to equally suppress the female methods of antisocial, anti-intellectual, anti-economic, and anti-political warfare as much as the male – while recognizing that the abrahamic religions and marxist sequence are simply applications of the female means of seduction, influence, manipulation, undermining, baiting into hazard, sedition and treason against the natural aristocracy and the meritocracy that evolve from the application of western natural law of tort which we call equity – and non aggression against demonstrated interests.

Affections all
Curt

Reply addressees: @HoppeQuotes