Brilliant from both Points of view and I try to accommodate both when possible.

Brilliant from both Points of view and I try to accommodate both when possible. 😉
I suppose that since I work on incentives which means the use of indirection (bouncing the cue ball off the rail for every shot), and that since my purpose is indirect also, it’s easy to fail to grasp my meaning and intention: we are in a period of integrating the lower classes, then women, the jews, then third world immigrants, and even muslims, all of whom have lower desire and much lower capacity to bear the responsibility of whiteness, unless men AND women form families that depend on ‘whiteness’ (responsibility for self, private, and common) to maintain a low cost high trust polity where we require less income for higher quality of life, and can support single parent families.
So, I work to outlaw hostility to, competition with, undermining of, sedition against, and treason against ‘whiteness’ meaning the group strategy and tradition of western civilization: the maximization of individual responsibility for mind, self, family, private, and common.
Very few others groups can do so. And even our own women, unless heavily insulated from social, economic, and political conflict, fall victim to the seduction into the false promise of the evasion of that massive burden of responsibility necessary to bring about and maintain a hight trust polity, and all the benefits to ourselves our people, and mankind that have resulted from it.

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @radiofreenw