I am attempting to explain to you using the common objections (which are on wiki

I am attempting to explain to you using the common objections (which are on wiki, and other places) why EU cannot provide evidence other than narrative just as Einstien’s general relativity cannot explain the apparently influence of the quantum background as other than a narrative of ‘space time’. So as I understand it, (and I have done a study of pseudoscientific theories in physics) and specifically because i’m an epistemologist that works on first principles (foundations), and have done deep work on the scientific method and the problems of systematizing, dominance bias, and the emergence of error, bias, and deceit – including the fictionalisms that result, I am keenly aware of why you are demonstrating the behavior you are, why the EU is an overreach, and what foundations it’s lacking in order to justify your and other’s fascination with it.
This is not because it is entirely false. It’s because it is still lacking sufficient foundation to make a truth claim rather than an explanatory power claim.
And as far as I know there is no one living or dead that understands testifiability as well as I do.

Reply addressees: @controscience