RE: SIMULATION THEORY (pseudoscience, sophistry, ‘religion’.) –“Q:Curt:Could I

RE: SIMULATION THEORY
(pseudoscience, sophistry, ‘religion’.)
–“Q:Curt:Could I get you to spell out for me how simulation theory reflects the behavior of human memory?”—@AMaskedMartyr

Always happy to answer intellectually honest questions respectfully asked. 😉

We reconstruct memories constantly in response to present modeling, patterning, and understanding. ie: reverse causality.

Add to this that while we perceive space and time within our range of sense and perception with extraordinary accuracy for any purpose for which we are capable of acting.

However, we project our auto-associative ‘predictions’ (imaginations) upon that accurate perception and thus create cause and consequence in our imaginations from the oft ignorant, erroneous, if not absurd content we have managed to accumulate in memory over time.

So, we differ within the margins of human indifference, in ability, in bias, in experience, in knowledge, and as such in presumptions. And we project a near infinite fiction both causal(back) and consequential (forward) on top of local sense perception (present).

Reality however remains objective and consistent independent of of those differences in our projections – and that’s why we require such a thing as truth: decidability – so that it is still possible to cooperate on means if not ends, when there are differences in our perceptions of cause and consequence.

Simulation theory is nonsense.

But you know, from what I understand at the moment, the discipline of philosophy is essentially dead and has been for as long as physics has been failing.

Affections;
Please feel free to ask questions for clarification.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @AMaskedMartyr @ScottAdamsSays